A Band-Aid For Healthcare

I have not spent a bunch of time rallying either for orsystem in the process. Take things slow - test a
against the healthcare debate, mostly because whatcouple of ideas and fine tune the balance to get the
I say or think will not make one iota of differenceBEST answer rather than any old answer. My happy
anyway. So why get a full head of steam built upband-aid fix for healthcare is to simply split it up into
when there is no train on the track? Since steamsmall parts and let the light of day expose the
trains don't routinely run the tracks any longer, thisTRUTH on whatever it is that is being pushed upon
analogy just does not make any sense? Well that isus.
EXACTLY how I feel about this healthcare bill as it isIf Congress is sincere and they truly can come
currently written.together on sensible provisions for health plan
At 2800 pages long, THIS health bill it is just tooportability or the elimination of preexisting condition
much for anyone to get their proverbial arms around,cut-offs; then VOTE on those pieces now. Put off
much less actually digest. It confounds me as tothe provisions that cause the Unions to go nuts, the
what the big attraction is in this bill that makes growninsurance companies to fight, and the rest of us not
politicians throw caution to the wind along with theirto trust anybody that sets foot in Washington.
potentially long political careers just to cram all of thisIn the end the REAL problem with healthcare access
through RIGHT NOW? Doesn't that make anyoneis ALL cost driven - not features! If you get rid of
else just a little bit curious and NERVOUS? Just whatthe obscene LIABILITY exposure for doctors,
flavor of Kool-Aid are these folks drinking?hospitals, medical equipment and drug manufacturers,
Now I completely understand the President'sthen you will be a step closer to a workable solution.
reluctance in throwing the WHOLE bill out and startingThe government could set strictly DEFINED limited
over. Even if I were naive enough to believe thatliability schedules and enforce them. No more
Congress really will put the interests of the peoplemulti-million dollar judgments for a severed toe or
FIRST (THIS TIME) over their individual partysimilar misfortune. People would still be protected
agendas, I personally don't think another year ofadequately from abuse or malpractice, but no more
debate will change much? It's clear that both sidesre-distribution of wealth in the hundreds of millions to
are more interested in gaining a political advantagea few lawyers at the expense of the many.
over each other than solving the basic issues andCongress need not concentrate on EXTENDING
that drives the public crazy. We know these peopleaccess if it focuses on driving down COSTS including
are wasting our time, money and worse yet theylegal liabilities. As costs lower, and real market-driven
SUPPOSEDLY work for us? The reality though is thatsolutions take hold, the ideal of increased access and
this is AMERICA, not Europe and MOST Americansuniversal coverage will soon become closer to a
are not interested in giving up their world-classreality. Will Rogers said "People's minds are changed
healthcare availability to emulate inadequate socializedthrough observation and not through argument" so
medicine models despite the President's goodquit bickering over thousands of pages of 'gotchas'
intentions.and legal 'twists' for special interest groups. Divide the
In general I'll admit it! I am stupid and impatient whenlegislation up into easy-to-understand and small
it comes to reams of legal descriptions, covenants,digestible chunks and give them an Up or Down vote.
and provisions on just about ANYTHING. So why notRemember It's the U.S. taxpayer who is footing the
make it easy on me and anyone like me when thesebill, so please try using a band-aid FIRST to fix
guys go to write a 'GOOD' healthcare bill? Quit tryinghealthcare BEFORE subjecting all Americans to a
to be all things to all people and bankrupting theSocialist European 'BODY CAST'!