A Book Review - American Foreign Policy - Carter to Clinton

The book is part of the American History in Deptha period full of crisis. Reagan's policies are discussed
series. The author is John Dumbrell and the generalafter Carter's. First his decision to increase defense
editor of the series is A. J. Badger. The book isexpenditure is stated and the fact that he believed
published in Hong Kong, 1997, by McMillan Publications.that America must develop a "high-tech shield that
It is in paperback (ISBN: 0-333-61094-6), and it is alsowould protect it from nuclear threats. Then his
available in hardcover (ISBN: 0-333-61093-8); withdoctrine is presented:" American sponsorship to all
papers suitable for recycling. No picture, table orenemies of communism in the developing countries".
graph can be seen in this book; except theThat's why he involved America in the Lebanese
photograph on the front cover that showscrisis so that it would not become a communist state.
presidents Carter and Clinton together. As we canHe also used human right as "an anti-soviet weapon".
see in the Bibliographical Note, the author usedAnother important thing about him that is analyzed in
secondary sources as well as some primary articles inthis book is his "shadow policy of "winning back Iran"
form of printed articles.that finally led to Iran-contra scandal. The Reagan-
The book focuses on the America foreign policy inGorbachev dialogue is one of the other things
the mid-20th century (from Carter's to Clinton'sdiscussed in this book. Then the book focuses on
presidency) that was marked with the "struggleBush's presidency claiming that his policies mainly
between liberal democratic capitalism and Sovietreflected that of Reagan's except his policies toward
state socialism". As it is stated in the introduction, thethe soviet that were more cautious than Reagan's. It
book discusses four major themes:is explained that how he faced a dilemma in the
1) ending of the Cold War,second gulf war. He wanted to oppress Iraq that had
2) the legacy of Vietnam Warinvaded Kuwait and at the same time to keep Iraq
3) American decline, andas threat to Iran. Clinton is the last president that the
4) the possibilities of the democratic foreign policybook speaks of. It says that like Cater, Clinton
after 1977.emphasized domestic issues over foreign policy. He
It examines the "long tradition of American optimism"tried to "close the book on Vietnam, by promoting
saying that despite apparent victories, Americanthe cause of US trade and investment. His military
optimism was under pressure during 1980s; the greatprogram is also mentioned stating that he belied that
pressure and damage coming from America's defeatits cost and size should be reduced.
in Vietnam War which as carter put it madeThe book is a good source of information for those
Americans understand that they are "no better thanwho want to study the Cold war period and the
other people". Throughout the book, it is shown howeffects of Vietnam war over American policies in the
attitudes and decisions in American foreign policysame era, especially undergraduate students who
were under the influence of the Vietnam legacy, withwant a general information about the this period. For
special focus on the four presidents of the era,those who want a detailed description of the
Carter, Reagan, Bush and Clinton. The author tries toAmerican foreign policy in the post-Cold war era, the
put the information together in an impartial way,book is not suitable because it does not go into
criticizing or approving of the events carefully.details of the events and developments, giving only
About Carter it is said that he believed that the coldan overall picture. However in the End Notes for each
war period had ended and that it was time to pursuechapter, one can find useful sources, books and
"domestic processes". His other goal was to putarticles that can guide him or her to further
commitment to human rights at the center of hisinformation about the topics discussed in chapters. In
foreign policy. But he never reached it because inthe Bibliographical Note also, the author suggests that:
some cases human rights were ignored because"much of the important secondary literature on
security issues were more important. In his time inrecent US foreign policy may be found in specialist
the office, 2 revolutions took place that were notjournals, notably Foreign Affairs, Foreign Policy,
favorable to US, one in Iran and the other inInternational Security and International Affairs.
Nicaragua. These events made Carter's presidency as