An Interview With Aruna Roy: Janadesh 2007

-- End Ad Box --->about the progress of the country in real terms are
Aruna Roy is a social activist who is best known forput behind bars. It is not an answer.
her endeavours for betterment of the rural poor inIt is quite evident that most of our natural resources
the state of Rajasthan. In 2000, she was awardedare located in the backward and tribal areas.
with the Ramon Magsaysay Award for CommunityGovernment is quite rightly saying that there is need
Leadership. Her continuous campaigns wereof resources for the development of society. But by
instrumental in enactment of the Right to Informationdoing that the livelihood of tribal and poor fall in
act -2005. She was as a member of the Nationaljeopardy. How can a balance be maintained between
Advisory Council for two years, where she helpedthese paradoxes?
and advocated the passage of the Right toAruna Roy: Have you heard about climate change
Information Act and the National Rural Employmentand global warming? Have you hared about depletion
Guarantee Act. Her contribution to the cause hasof forest? Do you realise that incidents like Tsunami
been widely acknowledged. Here is an Exclusiveand Katrina cannot be isolated? Do you realise that
telephonic interview of Aruna Roy with Santosh H Kpoles are melting and sea level is rising? Ironically, the
Narayan of Headlines India on contemporarypath of development our country is following is
socio-economic issues.leading us on the same path. So the exploitation of
Very recently you met Sonia Gandhi highlighting thenatural resources should be done judiciously. It can't
issue of tribal and poor peoples land. What was thebe given to institutions, who are interested only in
outcome?profit making. All the companies from abroad who are
Aruna Roy: I met her along with a delegation- whichnow making their presence felt in India have already
included many campaigners from 'Janadesh-2007',destroyed their own environment. They will do the
which is at present the main focus of our activity. Atsame even here.
least 25000 people are marching from Gwalior toLet's put all this information in the public domain and
Delhi, demanding a land reform policy from thehave a debate. In the era of Gandhiji, all the issues
government. Land should be given to the tillers at thewere debated publicly with Netajee, Ambedkar,
earliest. In the National Common Minimum programmeNehru and others. Only then the final decision would
the UPA government had promised that peoplebe taken. The issues ranging from the amount of
would get their land and their livelihood would beland that would be used for development; to the
ensured, therefore we went to ask the UPAenvironmental damage done in terms of global
Chairperson that there is a commitment made by thiswarming, everything should be debated. Let's analyse
government and it should be honoured. So, inall the facts and then decide what is good or bad.
principle, she accepted our claim, but regarding theAnd number two, the people who are going to be
formation of a land policy and the commission toaffected must be a par t of the debate. Not that
execute it, she told, she would be talking to theyou take a decision and then go and tell them that
Prime Minister. The PM has already been providedwe have decided these things.
with the papers related to the matter. We requestedIf you tell the rich people who are living in cities and
her that there should be some immediatehave invested their money that the government is
announcement by the government after duegoing to take their property for investing it in other
consultation with civil society groups and activists bydevelopment projects. Will they agree? In a
the time the ongoing march (Janadesh-2007) arrivesdemocracy, it is the right of the people- whose land
in Delhi. But Sonia didn't make any commitment.is being taken in the name of public purpose- to
As you said tribals and poor farmers are marchingknow what the public purpose amounts to. Just
towards Delhi. What are the targets they are aimingponder over Maoism. I think it is a very clever ploy
to achieve?on the part of people who want to resort to
Aruna Roy: There are no targets as such. They haveviolence. It is in their interest because once you
certain demands. Janadesh- 2007 is a fight for thedeclare an individual a Naxal or Maoist, you can kill him
right to live and livelihood. Their demands include thatanytime! If some body says that 'don't take my land'
the land should remain with its tillers. Farmers whothat person can be killed. Today, if you talk about
own land today should be given a commitment that ityour own land then you would be branded a Naxalite!
would not be taken away from them. For all thoseCapitalism is a fight for the private property. It says
who have been alloted land only on papers, should bethat there should be privatisation of everything. In
given the actual position of the same. People whothat context the land of poor would also be a private
got land at the time of Binova Bhave andproperty for some people.
subsequently during Indira Gandhi's period still ownGovernment is talking about food security, but poor
their land on papers. Violence against those who goand peasant are far from getting that and going
and cultivate on their own land should be checkedeven further away. How should the governmental
with immediate effect.policies be redirected to ensure the food security?
Land reform policy should be such that it ensuresAruna Roy: Firstly, let the farmers and tribal have
security and livelihood of thousands and lakhs oftheir land. Secondly, ensure financial stability to them.
farmers in this country. To what extent will Pepsi,Provide them loans at the same interest rate that
colas and Macdonald's will replace farming in thisthey were getting earlier. All the basic inputs of
country? Farming is an activity which incorporatesfarmers should be made available to them. Only then
many things. It is a employment programme; athe food security would be established. Because,
self-reliance programme. You just can't takethere have to be production before you have food
profit-loss account everywhere.security. You can't convert all your lands into mines; in
We can witness a continuous struggle going on byindustries, or use it in producing fodder for foreign
farmers and tribals fo rtheir rights. What do you thinkcows and simultaneously, have the food security. We
are the main reasons for that?have to ensure production and provide employment
Aruna Roy: The main reason for it is theto buy food security.
non-implementation of of land reforms in manyWe have been encountering reduction in farm
states. Over the last decade and a half, there hasproduces, especially in the form of after affects of
been a paradigm shift as far as uasage of land isthe Green Revolution. Do you think, there is a need
concerned. Earlier, there was less pressure on land,to have a second Green Revolution, although with a
hence, there was less of problem too. But in last 3-5different flavour?
years, the emphasis over the commercial usage ofAruna Roy: I emphatically believe that there is lot of
land has shifted towards acquisition and privatisationtraditional wisdom in India, which have always been
of land. Corporate farming and private farming isignored. What we must do at this stage is, to have a
being insisted upon. The banks don't allow smallcomplete introspection on agriculture. People here are
donors to have any kind of special subsidy whichpracticing farming from time immemorial. There are
they earlier had before. If you follow the line drawnfarmers who have been maintaining the available
by the international financial organisations, then Indianresources since then. We destroyed those in 50
farmers cannot have any subsidy, but ironically,years. So the fault is not with the farmers, but with
farming in US , Australia and Europe can beforeign technologies, which does not considers land
subsidised. Every single cow is subsidised in Europe. Inas a resource. It does not deal with the protection of
that context, people are getting alienated from theirthat resource. People and technology which nurtures
lands and livelihood. Thus, it becomes imminent thantrees and forest, protect the land, uses the rivers
ever before that the interest of 60 per cent ofwithout polluting them should be encouraged. People
Indian population be protected.still have such measures available with them. One has
There has been international pressure through WTO,has to reach to them. But if only one sided agenda
IMF and World Bank. On the other hand we are alsoexits, then there is no future.
witnessing domestic pressure from big corporateNumerically, India's GDP is growing at the rate of 8-9
houses to change the policies. Who is moreper cent. If it is, then how can it be utilised for the
responsible for the plight of poor?betterment of the people who are at the lower
Aruna Roy: These (domestic corporate houses) arestrata?
part of an international community. Are not IndianAruna Roy: 8 or 9 per cent growth is alright. But
corporates multinational? Even they are investing inwhat does it means in real terms? Whether it is going
various nations. Their nature is same. The Constitutionto increase private income and interest? We would
says that we are a sovereign country and ourlike to know exactly what does it mean. We would
representatives should follow our mandate. See, nolike to know the breakup of this GDP growth in
body would say that India should not be developedterms of building government resources. Unless this
and modernised. But, we should achieve it inwill go up, benefit of this GDP will never reach to the
indigenous way and with our own design.larger section of the country. It is government and
We have seen changes in the government over time.its policies which is directly responsible for the state
Various political parties came and went. But theof the people. Private companies can't be forced to
policies do not seem to changing. Do you think theredo these things (developmental).
is huge market pressure on the government-So, do you want to say it has 'failed'?
irrespective of the political party governing?Aruna Roy: I don't say that. But nothing much has
Aruna Roy: Who is taking the pressure. Are we notfiltered down to the people. I don't see any village
an independent entity? If we are, then to what angetting road, electricity and school due to this high
extent a government could be pressurised? Amartyarate of growth. In fact people from rural areas are
Sen won the Nobel Prize for economics. He says thatmigrating to live in urban slums. If it doesn't happens,
we can't have globalisation with inequality. If thethen this growth will have some meaning.
developed countries say that they have surplus ofYou have been very much attached with RTI,
money to invest in India, then we Indians havepersonally. What is the difference this law has made
surplus of manpower. Let the developed countriesin the day-to-day lives of a common man?
allow our skilled manpower walk freely in theirAruna Roy: I think RTI, in real terms, has made a
country. How can they expect us to do away with allphenomenal difference. Two-three things which it has
the restrictions, while they continue with most ofdone are remarkable. The first and foremost one is
them.that it has democratised the people in a better way.
Of late there has been furious actions by Naxals inIf you don't demand answers then the people, who
many parts of India. They are against any kind ofare at the helm of affairs, would not be reigned in
developmental activities being carried in backwardand then everything would be snatched and sold. This
areas. How can this approach be justified?fact has been understood by many. Recently,
Aruna Roy: They were never protesting against allHabibullah (Chief Information Commissioner) had
these 10 years ago. What was happening then?convened a meeting of Information Commissioners
Where were all these developmental activities inof all states. In this meeting, it was known that
these areas? Maoist and Naxal pockets are located inthousands of applications are coming from the people
those areas of the country where there was noof Maharastra for information. But other states are
development and rule of law. Tribals were killed.Theirnot maintaining even the records. So the government
land and resources were snatched. No body wasis not doing its duty, people are doing. Commission is
there to listen to their voice. Now, the roads andsandwiched in between. It does something and
electricity are being brought in these areas whenleaves something. In spite of that, RTI is one
multinationals are going to set up mines and factoriesimportant legislation which has given us hope. See,
there. Naxalism is the result of the loss of hope andbefore this, we were knowing that many things are
faith in the system. These things breed Maoism,going wrong, but we didn't know how to ask for
Naxalism and violence.that information, how to ask for accountability. This
I can say as a concerned citizen of India that thelaw has paved the way for maintaining accountability.
impact of developmental policies and rule of law haveNow something on a personal note. You left a
failed in these areas. People do not want to live withpowerful government job and came forward to work
violence. There have been repeated effort to denyfor people. Do you think that the type of
the right of life to them. If you offer them aadministrative setup we have, is producing hurdles in
package and take a decision to treat them equally,transparent functioning?
only then the Naxalism can be cubed down. ThisAruna Roy: The basic changes can't come under the
menace has only a political and economic solution.government. Administration is there to maintain the
Using of force against them is not going to do anystatus- quo. But bureaucracy is also needed to run
trick. It will only increase India's instability. We havethis country. An honest and accountable bureaucracy
seen the state sponsored violence like Salawa Judum.is necessary. We have wrong assumption in India
It is not a solution.that if one per cent of bureaucracy works properly,
When human right groups raise their voice againstthen the whole country would change. I feel that
such atrocities, then they are being captured and putthere must be a democratic and accountable system
behind the bars, for example Vinayak Sen. He iseverywhere. Bureaucracy has a role but perhaps we
graduate from Christian Medical College and is a goldgive too much of hype to it.
medalist. He established a big hospital at Raipur. ButIs it not because we adopted the bureaucratic setup
the state government put him into jail by terming himmade up by Britishers and did not change or modify
a Maoist. Those who talk about human rights andit according to our necessities?