Ayat-Ayat Cinta, Ahmadiyah and Pancasila

The phenomenal success of both the movie and thecritically and do not pose any problems to the
book Ayat-Ayat Cinta (AAC) is a reflection of ourestablishment.
social conditioning and aspirations. What is interestingThe movie is pluralistic in the sense that it has a
is that AAC has been able to dilute the "differences"Christian character. I hope we do not believe that to
in such conditioning and aspirations to the extent ofbe the definition of being pluralistic. Even then, the
being unrecognizable. The movie and the book haveauthor Habbiburrahman has been criticized by
been equally appreciated by our President, our clergyhard-liners. They argue, "Why should a Muslim defend
and normal people.the rights of an American in Muslim Egypt?" The
The question is, do we need a book or a movie likeauthor's defense is actually based on civil and human
AAC to unite us? If we do, then we have somerights. And this is my third point: many of us are not
very serious problems here.appreciative of other peoples' rights.
"Ayat", to my understanding, is Arabic for "proof" orNo wonder we are not sensitive to the plight of the
"evidence". "The proofs or evidences of the Lord'sAhmadis. They are being persecuted, but our
presence are scattered all over." All our scripturesauthorities, our clergy and an overwhelming majority
agree on this. "Those with eyes can see themof our people are not at all concerned about it. Madi
clearly."of Selena village was brutally killed; the Ahmadis could
Does AAC bear witness to the "presence" of ourbe killed too. At least one of our hard-liners is caught
Lord?on video shouting and screaming, "Kill, kill, kill the
Or does it bear witness to the presence of a "God"Ahmadis." We are silent.
as envisioned by one particular religious group? TheOur dear and beloved President could shed tears
book clearly promotes certain religious values, aswatching AAC, but his eyes are dry at the plight of
"understood" by the author based on his socialMadi, Ahmadis and others. Or, perhaps we lack
upbringing.paparazzi. Perhaps, he has been shedding tears in
A Christian girl praising Islamic values and falling in loveprivate. Perhaps the media just haven't caught him
with a young Islamic hero is not only acceptable butdoing it.
desirable. For a change, what about a Muslim girlI have nothing against AAC and its author. Let us
praising Christian values and falling in love with ahowever see AAC in the light of our indigenous
young Christian hero?cultural values as enshrined in the five points of
I wonder what would be the reaction of ourPancasila. What are the highest spiritual and universal
distinguished clergy who spoke so highly about thevalues in the movie that are not found in Pancasila?
film, and even appeared on television to promote theIndeed, Pancasila is at least one important step ahead
same.of AAC. A Christian does not have to convert to
I wonder if the producer of AAC would be willing toIslam to appreciate the universal values in Islam and
produce a movie along the above "opposite" line. Asin the prophethood of Muhammad (peace be upon
pointed out by a dear friend of mine, writer AyuHim).
Utami, this is a "dakwah movie". It promotes "certain"Our people are mesmerized by the Middle Eastern,
religious values. I agree with her. The author doesEgyptian setting of the movie. We value their
too. So, it is quite natural that those particular valuestraditions above our own, and we are both
are upheld over others.sentimental and emotional about them. The
The producers of the movie may not be interestedEgyptians, however, did not reciprocate our
in promoting anything other than their business. Aftersentiments. The producer of this movie had to film
all, they are entertainers. They would rather keepsome scenes in India, for a purely "material" reason.
away from polemic. Had they been in the West, theyAAC holds "males as the hero". Women are
would be filming just the opposite of AAC -- a Muslimsubordinates. They are all around the hero, and not
hero or heroine appreciating Christian values andvice versa. This is not Indonesian. This is very Middle
falling in love with a Christian. Ayu Utami rightly saysEastern. The "male" and the "masculine" in AAC are
that the movie has the same plot as Hollywoodso implicitly but definitely promoted, that one begins
movies of the 1950s.to wonder if love is masculine.
What does this prove? What are these ayatsAAC is truly a reflection of our present society. It
pointing at? First, we are still very much conditionedhas served well in pointing out to us the conflict going
by our narrow religious upbringing: I can tolerate you,on within us. AAC's stand on polygamy is a reflection
but whatever is said and done, my religion is theof such conflict. This is my fifth and last point. Deep
best.inside we are torn between foreign and indigenous
Second, my business is business. Do not confuse mevalues. Just consider our reaction to Ustadz A.A.
with other things. I am just an entertainer. I believe inGym, Wong Solo, and their polygamy. We could not
the second part of Machiavelli's doctrine of "food andaccept it.
circus" to keep people busy, so they do not think