Conflict Diamonds - What Do They Mean?

Conflict diamonds are essentially diamonds that arethere was little action taken against this type of
sold or traded in exchange for arms which are thendiamond, mainly because of the inability to trace a
used in either human rights violations or some kind ofgiven diamond's original and the inability of the UN or
terror or warfare. The reason why they are a majorany other country to intervene.
issue is because of the guilt associated withA change occurred in the 1990s with the publication
purchasing a diamond whose value went to theof the Fowler Report, which detailed the abuses and
purchase of arms and subsequent violence againsthuman rights violations occurring in those countries
innocent civilians. In addition, there are constantsuffering from civil war as well as the sales to
reports of violence against those who work theperpetuate war efforts. Because of this, the major
diamond mines or live in countries where diamondsplayers in the diamond industry, met in Antwerp in
are mined. However, the history behind conflict2000 and resolved to solve the problem of the
diamonds is quite complex and is linked to variousconflict diamond permanently by requiring industry to
regime changes in Africa and internal politics alongcheck the origin of each diamond to ensure the origin
with the interaction with diamond mining companies.is not a war zone. Following this resolution, the UN
The first major incident regarding these diamondscreated and formally established the Kimberly Process
was between the years of 1974 and 2001, whenCertification Scheme (KPCS), an initiative meant to
Angola suffered a devastating civil war that waseliminate the conflict diamond from the market
partially funded by the sale of diamonds. To wit, thepermanently.
UNITA party used diamond sales to fund their warThe conflict diamond has recently become a burning
against MPLA and FNLA parties. It also happens to beissue because of the discovery of diamond mines in
that this bitter war was essentially an extendedZimbabwe. The reports coming from Zimbabwe claim
violent dispute over who would rule following gainingthat the government has seized the mine and has
independence from Portugal. With additional civil warsforced the civilian population living near the mines into
in Liberia, Sierra Leone, the Ivory Coast, and thea quasi-slavery mining diamonds under threat of
Congo during the 1980s and 1990 and the partial toviolence. However, the government denies these
full funding of those wars by diamond sales, conflictreports and has continued with its actions, which has
diamonds became a burning issue.shown that the KPCS does not have the strength to
In response to these different wars, it becameprevent the conflict diamond from the market. The
taboo to own a conflict diamond and thus thereason why these diamonds became an issue is the
diamond industry faced a serious problem in whichreaction of the diamond market, which was the
the number of diamond purchases droppedrefusal to accept those diamonds as well as Martin
considerably. This was because some diamonds'Rapaport's 3 days fast during the KPCS's annual
origins were unknown and it was possible that thosemeeting in Israel in June.
diamonds were originally conflict diamonds. In addition,