Ineffectiveness of Development Aid For Developing Countries

In 1945, the United Nations Organization (UNO) wasThe reader should be warned because I cannot give
established to avoid a new world war. Another goala complete sketch of the existing theories of
of the UNO was to eradicate poverty in thedevelopment, only a few important theories will be
developing countries. This goal was and is still is adiscussed. In the fifties, modernization theories
very important reason for the existence of the UNO.dominated the foreign aid of the 'developed to the
The most important 'instrument' to fulfill was theunderdeveloped countries'. Development is being seen
creation of the International Bank for Reconstructionas a linear progressive movement of a 'traditional'
and Development (IBRD) or better known as thesociety into a state which can be perceived as being
'World Bank'. In October 2005, the UNO celebrated itsa 'modern society'. The example of the emergence
60th anniversary. What has it accomplished in termsof the nations in the Northern hemisphere is being
of eradicating poverty in developing countries? Theused to define the term 'modern'. Furthermore, the
sad truth is that 80% of the world populationdevelopment is being seen as a result of technological
controls only 20% of the world's resources; thisinnovations. The World Bank can nowadays still be
means that 20% of the population controls 80% ofidentified as the major producer of the modernization
the world's resources. This is not some sort oftheory. Economic growth is the key concept in this
'secret' fact, but something that most people know.theory. If the shortage of capital problem in the
Why is this sad reality a fact?developing countries is solved, poverty will vanish and
The first problem is related to the policy processan autonomous process of development will come
itself. This process is unfortunately not being done ininto motion. Economic dualism - the existence of, on
a straightforward and rational way; on the contrary.the one hand, a modern export-oriented sector in the
It is full of ambiguities and conflict. The secondeconomy and a local sector producing domestic
problem I would like to discuss in this article can becommodities on the other hand - is being seen as an
found in the theories of development. I have neverobstacle. The traditional sector (or informal sector)
encountered a universal theory of development. Thismust be eliminated in this view.
is not surprising because the strong impact ofThe developing countries in turn, reacted by
theories of development on policies for developmentintroducing their own theories. In the years
is not fully realized. Consequently, policies of1949-1950, Prebisch (the secretary of the Economic
development are always incomplete because there isCommission for Latin America) posed a theory called
no universal strategy available to cope with thethe center-periphery vision. The economies of the
problem of development.Latin American countries are situated in the periphery,
Development aid policywhereas the industrialized western countries are
In general, the literature concerned with the policysituated in the center. In order to change this
process is dominated by a particular view. This viewsituation, which only preserved underdevelopment,
is connected with the 'rational-actor paradigm'. In thisPrebisch proposed to introduce rapid industrialization
rational-comprehensive-policy model, theby substitution. The dependencia school (advocated
decision-making process is purely based on rationalby Frank and Dos Santos) goes even further than
and objective criteria. The role of objectively acquiredthe center-periphery school. In this school, the
information forms the basis of policy in this model.importance of the form and intensity of international
This standardized model is assumed to be universallyrelations are being stressed as a strong variable
applicable in every policy 'system', sector, or problem.which affects economic progress in developing
The following aspects represent this model:countries.
1. Clarification of values or objectives distinct fromIn the west, new thoughts arose as a reaction to
and usually a prerequisite to empirical analysis ofthe deficiencies of the 'traditional' views. The so-called
alternative policies;unified approach emerged (advocated by Myrdal and
2. Policy formulation is therefore approached throughGamini Corea - secretary of UNCTAD and UNRISD).
means-end analysis. First the ends are isolated, thenThe most important argument of this approach is
the means to achieve them are sought;that aid must be directed towards the groups with
3. The test of a good policy is that it can be shownlowest incomes or who are the poorest. But the
to be the most appropriate 'tool' to achieve certaindeveloping countries did not accept this modified
ends;view because they experienced it as an intervention
4. Analysis is comprehensive; every important andin their own internal affairs. In addition, the developing
relevant factor is taken into account;countries demanded a New International Economic
5. Theory is often heavily relied upon.Order. This New Economic Order should be based on
The separation of policy preparation or planning andjustice, sovereign equality, mutual dependency,
execution or implementation is a vital characteristic incommon interests and cooperation between all
the rational comprehensive methodology.states. Unfortunately, the structural changes of the
Implementation is being seen as a logical outcome ofinternational system in favor of the third world have
a well-prepared and formulated plan. But in thenot happened. But the discussion around the New
implementation of the aid policy, numerous projectsEconomic Order resulted in the so-called Rio-project.
failed due to negligence of the execution of the goalsThe members of the Rio-project developed a new
formulated. This implementation problem is not onlydevelopment strategy where the emphasis is laid on
limited to development aid policies, but it has alsothe self-reliance aspect of the developing countries.
been traced in numerous other policy fields.But the western nations have not stimulated this
A second property of the rational-comprehensiveself-reliance concept.
model is the consensus of the problem. It is beingPersonal reflections
presumed that the development of a certain countryI have lived for more than 30 years in a developing
is not problematic at all. All parties involved (donorcountry (Indonesia) and this country has received
and developing country) have reached an agreementbillions of dollars in terms of aid and loans. What is the
and the strategy chosen is therefore the result of aend result? Tens of millions still live in poverty. With
consensus of all parties involved. None of these arethe exception of the lucky few, some have been
true in reality. Development aid policy is the result ofable to improve their lives thanks to a combination of
negotiations between the actors involved. Actorseducation and luck. A minority (mostly of Chinese
with business interests, actors from the developingdescent) has been able to improve their situation due
countries self and last but not least, the actors withto their skills as traders. However, corruption is
political interests are constantly engaged inrampant and the new-born democracy has not been
negotiations. It is not difficult to imagine that theable to solve all these problems. It will take many
actor with the strongest bargaining positionyears before so-called 'sustainable development' can
possesses the power to overwhelm the actor actors.be achieved. Even with educating more people, the
It is not the objective scientific planner or other kindsituation will not improve in the short term. Despite
of specialist who has the final word. In most cases, itthe availability of abundant natural resources, the
is the most powerful actor(s) who wins.situation remains dim. If nothing is done against
A final aspect related to this model is the role ofdeforestation, all the tropical forests in this country
objective knowledge as an important pillar in thewill be gone in 2010; that is only four years from
decision-making process. It is being assumed thatnow. The situation might even get worse due to the
knowledge is the key to success. The moreinability of the majority to compete with other
knowledge about the issue is available, the easier it iscountries in terms of industry, trade, and services.
to solve the issue, in this case, the 'developmentBetter future?
problem'. This knowledge does not come from aNowadays, everybody is talking about globalization as
magic box. On the contrary, it comes from strictthe 'cure for all diseases'.
scientific research. So, scientific research is the sourceThe developing countries, however, are still suffering
of knowledge and henceforth plays a crucial role infrom underdevelopment, poverty, and human rights
policy-making processes. The influence of the actorsviolations. How can globalization solve all these
is neglected because they have reached a consensus.problems? The dawn of the 21st century is not
In reality, scientific research plays a very marginal andmarked by a better global situation, but by more
minor role in the policy-making process. Policy makersglobal instability with individual states scrambling for
only use scientific findings when it is in accordancenuclear weapons, a senseless 'war against terrorism',
with their own ideas. Policy makers draw policies ondestruction of the environment, and doubling of the
the bases of their own good judgments andpopulation in the next 40 years. It will take a lot
experience and not on scientific findings. Afterwards,effort from all people in the developed and the
they tend to seek objective findings which actuallydeveloping world to solve all these problems and
support their policy which has been formulated longcreate a better world for our children and
before.grandchildren.
Theories of development