Is One-Person-One-Vote The Most Democratic We Can Get? Or Can Weighting The Vote Bring More Fairness

Steve Glickman, president and founder of thePersonally, I'd be ok with a smaller vote because I'd
Democratic Empowerment Party, is a would-beprefer to have a large income. If that means giving
reformer of democracy and defender of theup some political power to those who need it for the
underdog like you've never seen. Hegelian ingreater good, fine.
approach, he wants to balance economic power andPB: A lot of poor people already don't vote. Why
political power through a provocative approach heshould they get more of a vote?
calls vote sizing. Simple in concept but profound inSteve: Many are disillusioned because the current
repercussion, the idea is to give larger votes tosystem doesn't work. Did you know that a hundred
people at the lower end of the economic ladder. Iyears ago, people arguing against giving women the
interviewed this reluctant leader by phone from hisvote said that women didn't want to vote, weren't
apartment in Vancouver, BC.smart enough to vote, and that such a nasty
~~~~~business should be left to men? Critics of vote sizing
PB: You've come up with a radical idea for reformingsay the same thing about people who are poorer and
democracy by weighting votes. How long have youworking class -- that they aren't as qualified to vote.
been working on this?That was also the argument against giving freed
Steve: Over 20 years. I developed it as a philosophyslaves the vote and the premise behind the poll tax.
student in university. I realized that there are twoBut many women and blacks worked tirelessly and
major forces in society -- money and power. Most ofeven died securing the right to vote. America has a
us believe in the separation of church and state. Well,history of having low expectations of women and
I believe just as strongly that wealth and powerpeople of color. We want to improve the situation of
should be separate. Because when they overlap, wepeople who are struggling, but it always seems that
get corruption. So the way to separate wealth andsome expert has the answer. I say poor, working
power is to increase the power of the powerless byand middle class people know better than anyone
increasing the size of their vote.else what is going to improve their situation. Let's
PB: The principle of one-person-one-vote is sacred togive them a chance to prove it. So what if they
most Americans. What moved you to tinker with it?don't have a formal education? There is a lot of
Steve: I really didn't want to. I avoided it for yearswisdom in poor communities. I believe if we raise
because there are a lot funner things to do thanexpectations with a weighted vote, the result will be
trying to root out corruption and change fundamentalempowerment, responsibility and progress. But I don't
democratic principles. But I took a trip to Indonesia aobsess about what they will vote for. I have enough
few years ago, and I witnessed first hand the awfulfaith in people that I think they deserve a chance to
effects of powerless poverty. As I talked with sofigure it out for themselves. That's democracy at
many desperate people who had no power towork.
change their situation, I realized that they had a lotPB: The last two presidential elections, some people
of wisdom but no way to realize their ideas. It brokebelieve, were stolen. How would vote sizing address
my heart. So I decided I to summon up my couragethat problem?
and become a full time advocate for vote sizing.Steve: Vote sizing would use paper ballots with
PB: I don't know when I've heard of such a radicalprinted bar codes and offline scanners to insure
idea for changing a fundamental principle. Why soautonomy, accuracy and a paper trail. But election
drastic?fraud, like electronic voting, is only one tool that
Steve: Is it drastic? I'm not an anarchist, corporatist,tyrants use to disenfranchise us; there's also
socialist, communist, fascist, or fundamentalist and I'mgerrymandering, payola, a dumb-downed debate,
not for one world government. I just want to workshadowy appointments, foreign meddling, and more.
within government to move it toward moreAlso, tyranny is only one of corruption's four sides -
democracy.the other three being brutality, patronage and greed
PB: More democracy? But isn't vote sizing unfair?- so there's a lot we need to fix. Vote sizing is not a
Steve: Is it fair for some people to have all themagic pill to make all our problems go away; it's a
money and all the power, while the rest of us havedemocratic reform so we the people can elect
neither? Is it fair for children to be born into povertysensible, honest leaders who care about all of our
with limited or no opportunity to ever get out of it? Ifates, and not just corporate and super-wealthy
know some people point to examples of poor peopleinterests. That's why I don't trust so-called experts
working themselves out of poverty. And yes, thewho say they have all the answers. It's not them but
system always allows a few to escape. But thewe the people who know how to keep corruption at
current system will never allow the majority of poorbay.
and working class people to achieve a decentPB: Do you really think this could ever come to pass?
standard of living. It's rigged to prevent that fromSteve: It's a challenge because it's outside the box of
happening. And the middle class is always teeteringwhat people consider democratic. But think about this:
on the edge, just one major health emergency awaybefore 1920, was the US a democracy? Most people
from powerless poverty. Most of us are sowould say yes, even though half the population
preoccupied with making ends meet that we have nocouldn't vote for the president or congress. So
energy or time to focus on the corruption that oozesdemocracies can always be more democratic. We
back and forth between government and industry.should remember that women's suffrage came after
That's what's unfair!a century of struggle. Before women's suffrage, no
PB: You are so passionate about this. Why?one except the visionaries could see its inevitability. I
Steve: I'm pretty much terrified of the path we aresee vote sizing as the next reform that brings even
on. I don't know why more people aren't as scaredmore fairness, so it's inevitable. But it still will take
as I am. A few counterfeit leaders and insulatedtime and encounter plenty of resistance. I would just
puppet-masters cannot continue to dominate thechallenge people to set aside the sanctity of
rest of us and the environment this way muchone-person-one-vote for a day and see what is
longer. There will be disastrous consequences - it'spossible.
already happening. There's one man in Africa who isPB: Would you have to change the constitution to
as scared as I am of this situation. And he's evenput this in place?
more courageous than I am. Julius found my websiteSteve: The US constitution would have to be
four years ago and is working to establish a branchchanged for federal elections and charters for local
of the party in Cameroon. He doesn't have a degreeelections. But you can use vote sizing anywhere
or subscription to the Wall Street Journal, but he ispeople vote for anything. We have a business model
very smart, brave and authentic. He assists localthat would give janitors and secretaries weighted
university students in writing their papers on subjectsvotes to elect the CEO. We also propose weighting
of history, philosophy, African and English literature.votes inversely to students' grades in schools when
I don't think it's fair that he has to save up hisit's time to decide the curriculum. Like in politics or
money to go to the internet café just tobusiness, vote sized learning encourages cooperation
email me, that is, if the power is on. I have so muchrather than competition, which could really help our
respect for this man. He literally risks his life when heschools.
gets on the radio or in the newspaper promotingPB: How can people get involved?
democratic reform. Some of his friends and neighborsSteve: I'm so glad you asked because vote sizing is
tell him he is wasting his time and that rich people willreally about the voices of the people, and not so
kill him if he continues, but he says he isn't doing thismuch mine. There's plenty of ways people can get
for himself but for future generations. I'm passionateinvolved at They can brainstorm ideas and engage in
about increasing his power because I want him anddialogue online. They can become a member of the
billions of people like him to have a chance to live aDemocratic Empowerment Party. They can start
decent life.their own local chapter. We need lots of courageous
PB: But why do you want to punish the wealthy? It'speople who have faith in each other to step up and
not their fault that others are poor, is it?join the effort. Leadership positions are available.
Steve: I don't want to punish anyone. That's like~~~~~
saying that giving the vote to women or freedDon't be surprised if a South American chapter of
slaves was done to punish men or plantation owners.the Democratic Empowerment Party is announced
I want the wealthy to keep their money andsoon. Glickman plans a trip to Cartagena, Colombia for
participate in a healthy capitalist economy. But to bethe month of February 2008 to recruit people who
fair, they shouldn't also have the power. If they needwill promote vote sizing in South America. He'll be
power, they can choose that - but they'll have totaping his adventure to document the early
reduce their income to get a weighted vote.development of the DEP's Colombian branch.