The Bolivian Water Wars - Corporations and Revolutions

International corporate conspiracy, fighting in theaverage which earned a monthly income of about
streets of Bolivia with tear gas and bullets and a$100. Increases were justified as payments towards
power struggle at the highest levels of internationala dam project. A manager for the consortium made
politics and business; it sounds like something from amatters worse by threatening to shut off water
James Bond novel, but it actually happened in Boliviasupplies if Bolivians were unable to pay. The poor
in 2000. High in the Andes, trouble had been brewingquickly joined in protest; their numbers increased
for fifteen years, but no-one expected it to boil overwhen the middle class and business owners lost their
for the right to drink a glass of water.government subsidies and their rates also rose.
Problems for BoliviaPanic in the streets
Hyperinflation destroyed the Bolivian economy inThe response to the rate increase began in in
1985, rising at an incredible 25,000%. ForeignJanuary 2000 with a 4 day strike and boiled over into
investment possibilities were destroyed, and in thea national state of emergency that created various
financial crisis the World Bank stepped up to loan theviolent clashes, resulting in numerous injured police
government money when no-one else would. Asand protesters and five deaths. After a televised
condition for it support, the Bank demanded steadyrecording of a 17 year old being shot to death by a
privatization of Bolivian facilities, including airlines,Bolivian army Captain, public outcry forced the police
telephone networks and railways. Our story begins into tell the executives of Aguas de Tunari who had
2000 when, according to The Economist magazine,been relying on their protection that their safety
the World Bank told Bolivia of the possibility that itcould no longer be guaranteed. The executives fled
would not 'renew' a $25 million loan. To secure theto Santa Cruz and resistance to civil protests
loan, the government needed to privatize its waterdissolved. Within days the leader of the resistance,
systems, based on concerns about the efficiency andOscar Olivera, signed an agreement that pushed
sustainability of the state system.Aguas de Tunari out of Bolivia and turned
Enter the ConsortiumCochabamba's water resources over to the state
Bolivia set the wheel in motion to privatize. Only onefacilities, revoked Law 2090 and released all the
bid was put in for the state agency SEMAPA; adetainees from the conflict.
consortium called Aguas de Tunari formed by foreignThe aftermath
corporations Bechtel Enterprise Holdings (USA),It all sounds like a happy ending, but for the $40m
International Water Limited (England) and Edisonlawsuit filed by Aguas de Tunari against the Bolivian
(Italy). Aguas de Tunari projected a water networkgovernment for being forced out of Bolivia and
to provide drinking water to all of the people ofviolating their mutual contract. The lawsuit was
Cochabamba, a city in central Bolivia. This was set toeventually dropped in 2005. In Cochabamba water
double the existing coverage area and also introduceprices have dropped to pre-2000 levels, but service
electrical production to more of the region. Theand supply are still poor and SEMAPA is even more
Bolivian government under President Hugo Banzerburdened by inefficiency. With an unsuitable budget
agreed to the terms of its sole bidder Aguas delto expand resources and develop what already
Tunari and signed a $2.5 billion, 40-year concession toexists, Cochabamba seems to be in the bizarre
provide water and sanitation services to theposition of exactly where it was fifteen years ago,
residents of Cochabamba, as well as generatebut with the history of a very messy conflict.
electricity and irrigation for agriculture.So what do we take away from this story? There's
Warning signsthe obvious problem of international corporate
To legally support the contract, the governmentinterests paying little attention to the needs of the
passed Law 2029. Concerns arose amongst Bolivianspopulation that they were supposed to be serving,
that it would lead to a monopoly on all waterbut that's not the most disturbing insight. The reason
resources; for example, the communal irrigationfor the violent and passionate protests by the
resources used by farmers that had beenBolivian people was due to the fact that they were
independent of regulation. Previously free water couldhaving their access to water taken away. It's a
be charged at the discretion of Aguas del Tunari.common saying that "Water is life"; as oil becomes
Nasty surprisesscarce, will we see water become the new global
As soon as they took control of the water supply,commodity? We can live without oil, but what would
the consortium started making some unpopularhappen if our water supply was passing through
changes. A 35% rate hike to an average of $20 apolitical or commercial interests?
month put incredible strain on Bolivian families, the