The Burka Debate

Last week French President Nicolas Sarkozy called forthe Muslim population of Europe. These problems
a parliamentary debate to decide whether to legislatemay be better addressed by dealing with the issues
a ban on the Islamic niqab, the face covering veilthrough Islamic religious and community leaders rather
which is estimated to be worn by less than 2,000than taking a hard-line approach that may alienate
members of France's Islamic community. He called themany Muslim communities and create no constructive
garment "a sign of subservience, a sign ofchange. In Afghanistan the Gender Equality Project
debasement" and said he believed that it threatenspromoted by the United Nations has been helping to
the dignity of women. If such legislation is enforcedraise awareness of women's issues by working with
women who are found guilty of defying the banmullahs to make people in their community aware of
could face fines of up to 750 Euros.their rights and entitlements in accordance with
Is criminalising the hijab likely to help promote theIslamic law. Implementing changes with sensitivity to
human rights of women in the Islamic community? Inthe culture and customs of the Islamic populace is
predominantly Muslim countries the laws pertaining tomore likely to have an enduring effect than enforcing
this issue vary, in Saudi Arabia and Iran women arelegislation which restricts their civil rights. Proponents
legally required to wear the burka and face severeof the ban cite security reasons as an additional
punishments from the religious police if they do notfactor in prohibiting the hijab but international human
comply, in more secular Muslim countries such asrights advocates stress that security checks can be
Turkey and Tunisia the hijab is prohibited by law incarried out in private without compromising the
government buildings, schools and universities. Insafety of the general public. The proposed French
more progressive countries such as Indonesia it is alaws which may be implemented with the aim of
woman's personal decision to choose whether or notreducing domestic violence and oppression could in
to wear the veil, an individual's choice is not legislatedfact have the opposite effect, making some women
by the government. Many educated independenteffectively prisoners in their own homes.
women who are devout Muslims opt to wear theEuropean governments will have to further examine
veil, will taking away the autonomy andthe impact that restrictions of religious expression will
self-determination of these women actually help tohave on this community and formulate solutions that
liberate those who are forced to wear the hijabwill maintain respect for faith and cultural diversity
under duress?whilst ensuring that women are free to make choices
Many believe that the wider issue is that of coercionthat are not influenced by abuse, coercion or the
and domestic violence, which is not addressed bylegislative undermining of their right to
legislation which is designed to cosmetically assimilateself-determination.