United Nations - Useful Or Useless?

The UN "Charter" principles begins with a prayer: We,we are trying to enter in a more pragmatic view, in
the peoples of the United Nations (...) we want tothe human fact of this "superior" organization.
proclaim anew our faith in fundamentality of human"Useless Nations" is a nickname of the UN applies by
rights... ". It's a prayer to whom? Surely not God! ItAmericans, which disapprove support United States
may be some illuminist goddess? It may be possible,pays to UN. This is a pragmatic and a practical point.
and then, at the very first instance, UN does notMoreover we know that this "Human Right
have any spiritual perspective to bring the love ofOrganization" has proclaimed Fidel Castro "World Hero
God in the world.of Solidarity", receiving an award by UN General
It's an organization devoted to something differentAssembly Miguel D'Escoto Brockmann. That's an
which, in a human viewpoint, is more powerful thatadditional pearl of these "gentlemen", which probably,
God Himself perhaps.affected by Socialist illness, have forgot those prison
That's a good starting point but since its creation UNcamps still used "democratically" and in full respect for
has been also a vain authority to prevent genocides"human rights" as established in the UN Charter, by
and warfare across the world. We remember oncethe Castro regime.
an expression, which clarifies that only God givesAnother affaire of this heroic wisdom is the request
authority. Again is there something hidden? It mayof the US Administration to UN to favorite the
possible that they would follow a politically correctrelease of the dictator Manuel Zelaya and restore his
approach with a relativistic perspective versusCommunist Presidential power.
Religions. I then wonder why do not bring the wordsIt's useless, we believe, to list additional interesting
"Love" within their statement. It is possible that theysupport to the Islamic regimes across the world
hate love?which demonstrate that UN counts nothing.
This starting point is reasonably philosophical, but now