What Is Community Media?

Community media is described by Ellie Rennie (2006),community broadcasting enables greater participation
in a broad sense, as "community communication."by communities in national and international affairs. It
Fundamentally, it is elusive to define the term in anhas a dual role - that of a mirror (reflecting the
absolute manner because it can take so many forms,community back at itself) and that of a window
be applied by so many different groups of people,(allowing the outside world to look in at its
and be directed at such a wide range of issues. Theexperiences).
premise, however, that community media is aFraser, Colin and Sonica Restrepo Estrada (2001)
facilitative tool for discussion and engagement of theargue that community media provide a vital
ordinary citizenry has some inherent implications. Aalternative to the profit oriented agenda of corporate
major implication is that community media is for themedia. They are driven by social objectives rather
most part independent of the market-driventhan the private, profit motive. Community media
commercial and mainstream media outlets. This, inempower people rather than treat them as passive
turn, allows for different models of community mediaconsumers and they nurture local knowledge rather
to offer either a wide open editorial policy or a morethan replace it with standard solutions. Ownership and
fine-tuned approach that is still loyal to thecontrol of community media is rooted in and
encouragement of community participation. The keyresponsible to the communities they serve, and they
characteristics of community media convey a moreare suitable approaches to development, (Buckley,
clear understanding of its definition as well as its2000). The nature and purpose of community media
depth and dimension in terms of how it takes shapeinitiatives should be the most important determinants.
in the civic landscape (Rennie, 2006: 208).Resource shortcomings of any kind can be addressed
The South African definition is that community mediathrough alternative strategies. Steve Buckley (2000)
are either a geographic community or a communityobserves that democracy and communication are
of interest. Ideally then, community media areinextricably linked, so much so that the existence or
produced, managed and owned by, for and aboutotherwise of certain forms of communications can be
the community they serve, which can either be aa measure of the limits to which democracy itself has
geographic community or one of interest.developed or is held back.
"Community media is a two-way process, in whichCurran & Gurevitch (1991) state that the nature
the communities participate as planners, producersof community media is participatory and its purpose
and performers and it is the means of expression ofis development, "processes of public and private
the community rather than for the community."dialogue through which people define who they are,
It appears easier to posit an ideal definition ofwhat they want and how they can get it. Community
community media than to extrapolate a definitionparticipation is thus seen as both a means to an end
from the actual community-based media initiativesand an end in itself. The processes of media
existing on the ground (McQuail, 1994). The mediaproduction, management and ownership are in
used are different and, as is the case with video,themselves empowering, imbuing critical analytic skills
sometimes the medium used itself poses challengesand confidence about interpretations reached and
to the notion of community participation. Thesolutions found. The medium chosen must, therefore,
ownership and management patterns are diverse,be one that enables, enhances and sustains
even though they can be broadly defined ascommunity participation.
non-governmental and non-corporate. The levels ofFrom the above considerations, it follows that the
community participation are equally diverse. And thechoice of media to be used in a local community is
aims are quite specifically different, although again, innecessarily specific to that community. What works
general the aims are all for some aspect ofin one community may not work in another (Lesame,
community development.2005). For example, gender and age are factors to
The concept of community media implies that forbe taken into account when discussing sexuality, but
communities to be heard at national level, they havethe manner in which they are taken into account
to be heard at grassroots level first. The potential todiffers across communities. Literacy levels, access to
communicate and receive communication is a socialradio receivers in the community at large, familiarity
good, which should be fairly, universally and strictlywith symbolism and other visual devices used in
equal. Curran and Gurevitch (1991) state that the fullaudio-visual media are other considerations. The
concept of citizenship presupposes an informedchoice of theatre, local language newspapers, radio or
participant body of citizens, most generally, if wevideo - or any combination thereof - is and should be
suppose there to be a right to communicate then itdependent on both internal and external factors
implies an equal individual claim to hear and to be(Bessette, 2004).
heard. Similarly, Freire (1990) observes that the lessInternally, the choice should address the development
people are consulted, the less democracy a nationaims of the community concerned and build on what
has.forms of communication already exist, especially
Community broadcasting seeks to foster debatewhere the community concerned has a history or
about, reach consensus on and build solidarity intradition of educational music and dance. And
promoting and protecting human rights and achievingexternally, the choice should ensure ease and
sustainable development, including peace andeffectiveness of impact on the national and
reconciliation (McQuail, 1994). Community broadcastinginternational actors the community wishes to speak
is about both access to and dissemination ofto. For example, video is a powerful medium to raise
information. It acts as media for the flow ofawareness about human rights concerns, but it is also
information to and from communities, on the onea medium which does not necessarily or typically
hand, and the national and international levels, on theallow for the complexities of a situation to be
other hand (McQuail, 1994). It provides access toexpounded on and can thus lead to simplistic
needed external information as well as advocacy oninterventions for resolution. Participatory
issues of concern, with relevant policy making levelscommunity-based planning to make the choice of a
informed by experiences at the community level andmedium should take these internal and external
solutions generated therein. In a broader sense,considerations into account.