Iraq's Death Row for - Samar Saed Abudullan - CNN and Amnesty International Interfere

BAGHDAD, Iraq CNN has decided to published SamarThat is an obvious statement, and then they imply
Saed Abudullan's death row case (along with others),'(these death sentences) ...failed to meet international
not sure why, but it looks like Amnesty Internationalfair trial standards.' Here we go again, whose
has also got involved. Before I get too much in thisstandards? The west, the east or America's or
'pure opinion,' article of mine, I am writing; let me tellEurope's, and if it is the UN's standards, nobody really
you how I feel in a flash flooded way. I belonged topays attention to them, now do they. So a standard
Amnesty International once, and I always found outin one country may suite the country, where in
when they got involved, they never told the public,essence, it does not in another, or the UN's standard.
or me the whole story, just wanted support fromAs of today, the world is not completely polarized,
me, and everybody else. So I've learned not to trustthat is if you are not a coke or MacDonald's
their data all that much, nor their intent. And for CNN,hamburger.
I like their news, although in this case I think they areCNN and Amnesty International seem to not like the
not only slanted, but gullible, if not naive to take thisidea of Capitol Punishment (which is a personal opinion
as serious as they have.of theirs, and mine) which was reinstated into Iraq in
The woman in question, Samar, is innocent, so she2004 legally, just like in America, when it was originally
says, and in her case, who would not say the same.abolished in 2003--but they make a moral issue of
She of course blames her husband, who cannot voicethis, when it is not, it is a self-governing issue of that
his opinion because he has run off, as I would docountry. And since then 270-people have been
have done if I was him, most likely. And do theysentenced to death, so their data banks say. How
torture in Iraq? Most likely, but where do they not?many people did the 270-criminals kill? Perhaps 2270,
China, Russia and the good old USA, all torture, soor 10,000, who knows, they don't give those
who can really know. Anyhow, the question might be,statistics, as I expected. I also understand two of
why did she stay with a man that carried out killings?the women have their children with them, on death
Why did she not report him? She blames the judgerow (which is really a plea for mercy), this is good, so
for doing his job, if you kill someone, you should notthey can say goodbye when the time comes, and
be free to kill again, and run back to the husband youperhaps they can teach them, killing is not a good
protected during those so called innocent days yourthing.
husband killed at will, and you never notified theI am not putting in all the data here either, just like
police about. If you are living with a killer, you areCNN and Amnesty International, and the folks on
just as he is, not innocent. They say Iraq has the 4thdeath row, whom I'm sure have a one sided story.
highest execution rate, not sure which one is theAnd thus, people can say about me: he only looks at
first, but I'm all for it if it stops my neighbor fromone side, and perhaps they are right, but the side I
coming over and doing me in. Amnesty says '...suchlook at is more practical than theirs. They are looking
claims are not uncommon in Iraq,' nor are such killings,at a side that enables the criminal to continue, if
with the assistance of a spouse. They add, "(in Iraqreleased, to go home to kill again, and regroup with
there are) ...flawed trials and coerced confessions.'their husbands, the ones they blamed for everything.